a wonderful new world No Further a Mystery
a wonderful new world No Further a Mystery
Blog Article
Thomas Robert Malthus, 19th century British economist, believed the men and women on the Earth would sooner or later be threatened by their lack of ability to boost adequate food to feed the populace.
Huxley read a guide on Henry Ford, who was definitely the poster kid for sector and capitalism. In this particular reserve, he happens to be a deity of kinds.
In John, Huxley has created a shadow of Miranda within the Tempest, plus the civilization he finds is one that he in the end rejects in favor of probably the most Excessive sort of person option.
Asimismo, la parte remaining ha sido espectacular porque nos da una cátedra sobre la sociedad impresionante. Prácticamente cada una de las frases usadas allí son dignas de destacar porque son muy profundas, sencillas de entender y pueden convertirse en una información muy importante para cada uno de los individuos de una sociedad, es decir, para todos nosotros. Entre esa información, se destaca la necesidad de que exista en una sociedad las clases sociales, ya que sin ellas lo único que ocurriría sería un caos full. Hay Significantlyísimas frases para destacar, pero solo haré mención de dos porque descubrir esas frases hace parte del premio de quien se anima a leer esta obra:
To put it briefly, lives without having further that means. While consumers are anticipated to work flat out and successfully during working hrs, during off several hours people today are now living in an infantile way, in no way engaging their minds, and fulfilling on their own with sex and drugs.
Human beings could be made available the liberty of choice if they discover how to embrace range, expertise and variances of people rather then the "utopian" goal of "sameness" of one variety or another.
Por lo tanto, la premisa que nos ofrece el autor es muy interesante porque nos hace preguntarnos: ¿Preferirías vivir en un mundo con ciencia y conocimiento pero atiborrado de guerras, muerte y tragedia, o preferirías vivir en un mundo pacífico y estable, pero totalitario y lleno de ignorancia? Como pueden notar, elegir cualquier opción nos brindaría muy buenos privilegios pero asimismo grandes desventajas. Y no, no se puede erradicar todo lo negativo de un futuro porque se necesita un equilibrio, por lo que por ejemplo para que existan los milagros se necesita que exista el sufrimiento, o la presencia de la ciencia llevaría irremediablemente a la desconfianza, miedo, guerras y autodestrucción: Es algo a wonderful new world inevitable.
He last but not least convinces Lenina to choose him to an Indian reservation in the usa, wherever they fulfill the natives who have been untouched by technology. They get aged. They get Unwell. They die youthful. They provide start. This can be a #povertyporn journey similar to white westerns driving via African villages to allow them to position and say such things as...can you think persons Are living like this? Bernard is there definitely to experience a little something. Lenina is there to be overcome by all of the squalor and unfamiliar feelings of pain, but she is glad she came simply because she will rock her #Facebook page when she will get back again.
The reader will intuit that the this certainly a dystopia posing as a utopia, but Huxley's reliance on this emotion can be a philosophical failure. It is the stress with the writer to current us not by having an account of one thing We all know is undesirable, but to explain the supply of the expertise.
These are definitely non-fictional and factual characters who lived before the situations in this book, but are of Take note in the novel:
includes themes or scenes that may not be ideal for pretty youthful viewers As a result is blocked for their security.
[59] Smuszkiewicz wrote in his open letter to Huxley: "This work of an awesome writer, both of those in the general depiction in the world and a great number of information, is so comparable to two of my novels that in my opinion there is absolutely no probability of accidental analogy."[60]
اما هاکسلی از این می ترسید که دلیلی برای ممنوع کردن کتاب وجود نداشته باشد، چون اصلاً کسی خودش نخواهد که بخواند.
En resumen, un libro corto pero muy profundo e interesante sobre el comportamiento humano, la sociedad, las clases sociales y la religión, que seguramente no olvidarán nunca y querrán repetir varias veces porque sinceramente es una obra maestra en todo el sentido de la palabra. Es una novela que me ha encantado en todo momento, la volveré a leer en el futuro, quiero seguir analizándola, e incluso siento el deseo de realizar un podcast sobre este libro —a pesar de que nunca he hecho uno— para seguir profundizando y hablando sobre esta obra, que me ha parecido bastante, pero bastante interesante.